Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Michael's Film Shots
This shot goes from long shot to midrange shot from a low angle. While the low angle is normally used to show power, the idea here was to reverse the effect by emphasizing my confusion at being on a roof with no way down, and the vulnerability that the situation causes.
This is a documentary style point of view shot that shows a person running in a haphazard way, implying fear or running from danger. Instead of actually showing the runner, this view puts the audience in the place of the runner, viewing the world as the character does.
This midrange shot utilizes negative space along with my apparent fear to imply for the viewer that something bad is going to come from the left, which comes true when I get my throat slit.
Monday, September 28, 2009
The memento of flashback
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Casablanca

Thursday, September 17, 2009
Nothing New Under The Sun

Sunday, September 13, 2009
House of Flying Daggers of Predictability
Very preditictable in the sense that they wanted to make it very epic like when the weather randomly changes from fall-like to a heavy blanket of snow within 5 seconds. One is the jealous man who also loves the main female character and the other is her true love and both of course have to basically duke it out to prove almost which one is more worthy.
Many of the fight scenes in the movie take the 'Matrix' approach to things with the camera following the blade or arrow as it travels towards its victim in an almost slow-motion way. They probably did this to appeal more to American people and the style of fight scenes we are used to as well as to try to keep Asian interest by keeping the kung-fu style there. Personally, I think this strategy worked because I loved the fight scenes. It was the type that just made me go "OH MY GOSH!! That is so cool!". However, not everyone likes this style yet it was used in every single fight scene. They tried to Americanize the movie a little too much (with the slow motion, the predictable ending, etc) but I think it was successful in selling it to most of the American people :)
Monday, September 7, 2009
Reading Response: Profit margins=pointless films
Unfortunately, according to Garnham's essay, the studios have come to the point where they must aim at audience maximization when producing, drawing as many people to the film as possible to maximize profit before the film hits the underground market. To do this, the industry often relies on formulaic plots, such as this example from comedy website Cracked.com:
When Hollywood discovers a plot line that draws large crowds, they then produce several other releases with an identical idea because they are sure it will work. The result is a string of unoriginal movies with no intellectual value, defeating the purpose of film as an art.
The thing that Hollywood has not fully grasped, is that audiences will in fact go see a movie with a controversial, thought driven plot, as long as it still has an effective amount of special effects, action, and sex thrown in to appease the less cultured class of movie viewers. For example, the recent film, Watchmen, directed by Zach Snyder, made over $50 million profit. It not only contained a plethora of action, fighting, sex scenes, and effects, but was also driven by a highly philosophical plot, where a utilitarian genius creates world peace by nuking all the world's major cities. After much infighting and thought provoking discussion, the heroes decide that the controversial action is in fact justified, and kill the remaining dissenter to keep the peace, as seen in this clip:
This is proof that film makers can afford to take risks with their plots and still be successful economically. Once Hollywood adopts this viewpoint across the board, film will regain its place as a respectable, meaningful art form.
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Dun...Dun... Shark Attack!
There are many aspects to this movie that play with the audience's senses. Spielberg leads us on to believe that every time you hear the characteristic "Dun..Dun" melody of music a shark attack is coming. Well most of the time this is true, but it creates almost a similar situation to that of Pavlov's dogs. One begins to associate a sound with a particular action or occurrence.
There are also many background issues that are highlighted in this movie, by the rule of thirds Spielberg highlights the importance of certain characters throughout the movie so the audience's eyes are guided toward the center of the screen. Also the camera zooming in and out draws significance either toward or away from the characters depending on the surroundings. This was used much in conjunction with shark attacks to put emphasis on "Jaws".
"Jaw(s)" Dropping Movie
The film Jaws, directed by Spielberg, is an example of how Hollywood transitioned to make action-packed and technologically advanced films. These films were able to draw back in the moviegoers that Hollywood had lost to other forms of entertainment such as the television, VCR, and HBO. Jaws was an appealing movie to audiences because of its ability to keep viewers glued to their seat in suspense of when the next shark attack would occur on Amity Island. Not only does the film incorporate new technology such as the use of a realistic shark but it also evokes intense emotions out of the viewer. In the clip shown above, the chief encounters the shark face-to-face. His silence after this encounter is effective in making the viewer share this fear and shock. After he steps back into the cabin, he says that they need a bigger boat and this is important because it is when the true power and strength of the shark become a reality for the chief.